|
Whats the best port cleaner ? |
Post Reply 
|
Page <12 |
| Author | |
FriendlyHammer 
Master Carpet Cleaner 
Joined: 08/July/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1383 |
 Post Options
 Thanks(0)
 Quote Reply
 Posted: 27/November/2007 at 4:01am |
|
Yeah, you have to give them a 5 gallon pail of shredded packing peanuts to make the comparison. Something visual.
Edited by FriendlyHammer - 27/November/2007 at 4:01am |
|
 |
|
| Sponsored Links | |
|
|
|
DeepScrub
Senior Member 
Joined: 23/October/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 18/December/2007 at 9:25pm |
|
Which one is worth buying RECOIL 500PSI,OR THE NINJA 500PSI.bOTH WOULD BE HEATED OF COURSE.
|
|
|
"DO YOUR BEST"
|
|
|
|
|
Ed Valentine
Carpet Cleaning Specialist 
Joined: 14/September/2004 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 770 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19/December/2007 at 8:58am |
|
deepScrub;
They are truly two horses of a differnet color, period. |
|
|
|
|
DeepScrub
Senior Member
Joined: 23/October/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 102 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 19/December/2007 at 12:12pm |
|
What? so which is the best?
|
|
|
"DO YOUR BEST"
|
|
|
|
|
Johnsmith808
Groupie 
Joined: 22/December/2007 Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22/December/2007 at 9:03pm |
|
So if vacs run in paralled are so much better for carpet cleaning, why
do most machines have them set up in a series? Marketing?
Easier to install?
What would do a better job: 1)A unit with 2-3 stage vacs run in a series or 2)a unit with 2-2 stage vacs run in parallel? |
|
|
|
|
FriendlyHammer
Master Carpet Cleaner
Joined: 08/July/2007 Location: United States Status: Offline Points: 1383 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22/December/2007 at 10:02pm |
|
It seems to me that the better selling machines are all in parallel, but I could be wrong. The reason that so many are in series, I believe, is that 1) there is a misunderstanding by those maufacturers what actaully works, and 2) if you want to sell machines it's better to have a bigger number than a smaller number for the customer to look at. If your vacuums are in parallel, your biggest number will be the number "200," which will be your cfm. If your vacuums are in series, the manufacturer will tend to have a number over "200." The question is, would you rather have -- 200 of something that helps you clean carpet, or more than 200 of something that stopped helping after 130-140? Edited by FriendlyHammer - 22/December/2007 at 10:04pm |
|
|
|
|
Johnsmith808
Groupie
Joined: 22/December/2007 Status: Offline Points: 40 |
Post Options
Thanks(0)
Quote Reply
Posted: 22/December/2007 at 10:20pm |
|
Very interesting. I know when I bought my Diamondback, I went for
the 220" of water lift. I had no idea what the cfm was, neither
did I think it mattered. Now I know better.
So since waterlift is only really needed up to 140", and from what I've read, two 3 stage vacs can produce at least that much whether in parallel or series, then the cfm of 100 for series and 200 for parallel are the only numbers that mean much. Does that mean in this comparison, the vac performance of a unit in parallel is twice as good as once in a series (200 versus 100 cfm)? |
|
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
Page <12 |
| Tweet |
| Forum Jump | Forum Permissions You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum |
Topic Options
Welcome to KleenKuip.com's Professional Carpet Cleaners Discussion Forum!