Welcome to KleenKuip.com's Professional Carpet Cleaners Discussion Forum!

  
Carpet Cleaning Forum Homepage
Forum Home Forum Home > Carpet Cleaners Discussion > Portable Carpet Steam Cleaning Machines
  New Posts New Posts RSS Feed - Good article on CFM, Waterlift.
  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Events   Register Register  Login Login


Commercial Floor Cleaning Machines

Good article on CFM, Waterlift.

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Message
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Good article on CFM, Waterlift.
    Posted: 23/December/2007 at 5:20pm
This is a very informative article about the debate over cfm and waterlift:

http://www.hydramaster.com/inside/articles/articles2.asp

It's interesting to notice that truckmounts have lifts in the 13-15" Hg range, which is equivalent to around 175"-225" waterlifts, yet at cfm's around 300-500 or so. 

So when you consider running a portable with vacuums in a series, say 2-3 stage vacs, you will get upwards of 220" of waterlift, but the cfm will drop down to 90 or so.

When you run vacs in parallel, the waterlift will be around 140", which is around 10" Hg, but the cfm will then be at 200.

It would appear that running these vacuums in parallel would closer mimic the balance of cfm and waterlift that truckmounts use, but of course scaled back to portable levels.  When vacs are run in a series, the lift is as high as truckmounts, but the cfm is proportionately far lower, thus throwing the balance off.

As the article pointed to, only recently have more become aware of this balance.  Of course there have obviously been some who have been pioneering this understanding for many years, but the great majority haven't been listening, including your's truly I must admit.


Edited by Johnsmith808 - 23/December/2007 at 5:22pm
Back to Top
Sponsored Links


Back to Top
FriendlyHammer View Drop Down
Master Carpet Cleaner
Master Carpet Cleaner
Avatar

Joined: 08/July/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FriendlyHammer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23/December/2007 at 10:01pm
Imagine you made a machine with 1,000,000 inches of waterlift and only 1 cfm.  It would sell like hotcakes, but it wouldn't clean a darn thing.
Back to Top
Ed Valentine View Drop Down
Carpet Cleaning Specialist
Carpet Cleaning Specialist


Joined: 14/September/2004
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 770
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Ed Valentine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24/December/2007 at 1:18pm
Wonder where they learned that??????????? (!!!!)


merry Christmas;
Ed Valentine
cross-american corp.
Back to Top
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25/December/2007 at 5:53am
Would glides work better on a system running in a series or parallel?  
Back to Top
John L View Drop Down
Carpet Cleaning Guru
Carpet Cleaning Guru


Joined: 29/November/2004
Location: I'm Right Here!
Status: Offline
Points: 4013
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote John L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25/December/2007 at 10:57pm
Buy something F A S T and make some loot..!LOL
Back to Top
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26/December/2007 at 4:23am
Just when I think I understand this whole cfm and waterlift thing, I have another question.  Say you run a machine with dual 3 stage vacs in parallel or in a series.  Would running in parallel be better than running in a series for every hose length?

Say the numbers are Parallel= 140" waterlift and 200 cfm
                                  Series  = 220" waterlift and  95 cfm

Which would do better with 15 ft of hose? 25? 50?
Back to Top
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26/December/2007 at 8:02pm
I just got an explanation of where vacs in series or parallel would be beneficial.  I'm sure you guys already know this, but please be patient.

I was told that vacs in a series would be better with low pile, commercial type carpet.  I would think that would be because the seal is pretty good at the wand, so lift would come more into play.

Vacs in parallel would better suite thicker, residential carpet, due to the seal not being as tight, thus airflow being better.

Does that sound about right?
Back to Top
FriendlyHammer View Drop Down
Master Carpet Cleaner
Master Carpet Cleaner
Avatar

Joined: 08/July/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FriendlyHammer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27/December/2007 at 12:14am
Originally posted by Johnsmith808 Johnsmith808 wrote:

Would glides work better on a system running in a series or parallel?  


Parallel.
Back to Top
FriendlyHammer View Drop Down
Master Carpet Cleaner
Master Carpet Cleaner
Avatar

Joined: 08/July/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FriendlyHammer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27/December/2007 at 12:23am
Originally posted by Johnsmith808 Johnsmith808 wrote:

I just got an explanation of where vacs in series or parallel would be beneficial.  I'm sure you guys already know this, but please be patient.

I was told that vacs in a series would be better with low pile, commercial type carpet.  I would think that would be because the seal is pretty good at the wand, so lift would come more into play.

Vacs in parallel would better suite thicker, residential carpet, due to the seal not being as tight, thus airflow being better.

Does that sound about right?


Perhaps, but if you've ever seen that carpet, I would think you would wonder what the difference is. That pile is so thin that "pile" is almost an oxymoron. Sure the seal is strong, but how much water can you get in 1/8 of an inch of carpet?


Back to Top
FriendlyHammer View Drop Down
Master Carpet Cleaner
Master Carpet Cleaner
Avatar

Joined: 08/July/2007
Location: United States
Status: Offline
Points: 1383
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote FriendlyHammer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27/December/2007 at 12:25am
Originally posted by Johnsmith808 Johnsmith808 wrote:

Just when I think I understand this whole cfm and waterlift thing, I have another question.  Say you run a machine with dual 3 stage vacs in parallel or in a series.  Would running in parallel be better than running in a series for every hose length?

Say the numbers are Parallel= 140" waterlift and 200 cfm
                                  Series  = 220" waterlift and  95 cfm

Which would do better with 15 ft of hose? 25? 50?
'

The shorter the better. Don't go above 50 feet with parallel. And 25 feet in series. I'm sure others have their opinions, but that's mine. Frankly, I would only use more than 20 feet if I were doing stairs or upholstery that couldn't be reached with a shorter hose.
Back to Top
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27/December/2007 at 2:34am
Thanks Friendly.  I think I'm going to go ahead and turn my machine into parallel vacs.  I'm also going to make the intake on the recovery tank 2" instead of 1.5.  Shouldn't be too hard.  Of course I would then need to run 2" hose.

Yesterday I did a job using 15 feet of hose, and it dried faster than any job I've done recently.  It was actually easier to work with 15 feet of hose than 25 feet for the most part as well.

The only reason I use 50 feet sometimes is so I don't have to carry the machine upstairs on a two story house.  Now I plan on getting a continuous piece of 50 feet 2" hose and running the machine in parallel.   And for one story units, I'll stick with the 1.5 inch 15 foot house.  Would 2" on such a short hose even matter?
Back to Top
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25/January/2008 at 6:48am
Would adding a 3rd 3 stage in parallel for 125" lift and 300 cfm be a good balance?  Or would the lift be a little low for that amount of cfm.  Should I just stick to 2 3 stage in parallel for  125" lift and 200 cfm?
Back to Top
John L View Drop Down
Carpet Cleaning Guru
Carpet Cleaning Guru


Joined: 29/November/2004
Location: I'm Right Here!
Status: Offline
Points: 4013
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote John L Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25/January/2008 at 12:39pm
Add it.. I did on my Recoil.. Faster dry times.. Bouncing%20Smileys
Back to Top
Johnsmith808 View Drop Down
Groupie
Groupie


Joined: 22/December/2007
Status: Offline
Points: 40
Post Options Post Options   Thanks (0) Thanks(0)   Quote Johnsmith808 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25/January/2008 at 1:34pm
Sounds good!  Thanks.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Forum Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 12.06
Copyright ©2001-2023 Web Wiz Ltd.

This page was generated in 0.391 seconds.